Southdowners
Free Member
I thought I'd post this separately to my question on the 'high mileage?' thread as it's slightly different, although relates to the answers to that thread.
Obviously folk enjoy their vehicles in different ways.
My question is with regard to the re-sale value being affected..
Personally we don't feel bothered by selling on with a 'high' mileage - we bought the vehicles to use as we wish and enjoy what we want to do with them. It's hard to say, having sold two vehicles, whether our 'high mileage' affected their re-sale value. It certainly wasn't mentioned when we traded them in.
A couple of things come to mind though which are that mileage isn't the sole factor in a vehicle's overall condition. Clearly some people drive to a destination and stay put there, perhaps for months. We don't stay in any one place for more than a couple of days - this might change when we retire next April, but even then I don't think we would stay anywhere longer than 5 days or so as we like to travel.
Bearing that in mind, it seems to me that the vehicles in each scenario would deteriorate in different ways. We would clock up miles but the vehicles in one place would clock up wear and tear in the habitation area. I've read here that folk would rather buy a vehicle with reasonable mileage rather than one with a low one and that the engines are designed for heavy use.
Has anyone actually been told that their vehicle has been valued lower because of its mileage?
Same question to those with low mileage and high habitation wear
Obviously folk enjoy their vehicles in different ways.
My question is with regard to the re-sale value being affected..
Personally we don't feel bothered by selling on with a 'high' mileage - we bought the vehicles to use as we wish and enjoy what we want to do with them. It's hard to say, having sold two vehicles, whether our 'high mileage' affected their re-sale value. It certainly wasn't mentioned when we traded them in.
A couple of things come to mind though which are that mileage isn't the sole factor in a vehicle's overall condition. Clearly some people drive to a destination and stay put there, perhaps for months. We don't stay in any one place for more than a couple of days - this might change when we retire next April, but even then I don't think we would stay anywhere longer than 5 days or so as we like to travel.
Bearing that in mind, it seems to me that the vehicles in each scenario would deteriorate in different ways. We would clock up miles but the vehicles in one place would clock up wear and tear in the habitation area. I've read here that folk would rather buy a vehicle with reasonable mileage rather than one with a low one and that the engines are designed for heavy use.
Has anyone actually been told that their vehicle has been valued lower because of its mileage?
Same question to those with low mileage and high habitation wear