Government abandons MOT changes

[mikebeaches]

I was aware it has been muted for some time that the Government was considering various radical changes to the MOT process, for example: only testing private new vehicles when 4 years old rather than 3. And then ongoing MOTs only required every 2 years.

Well apparently that has all been scrapped, and the existing arrangements are to remain in place for now. Not sure if this news has already been posted, but I couldn't see it.

Details in the Honest John link:

http://tinyurl.com/ytka382y

 

[David and Sally]

Agree with the policy. The current system is about right. IMHO

 

[97243]

MOT every two years here in France

 

[David and Sally]

MOT every two years here in France

Having seen some of those French vehicles I can understand why.

 

[97243]

Having seen some of those French vehicles I can understand why.

I have found that the testers can exercise a fair measure of discretion, especially if you are selling a vehicle as, by law, it has to have 18 months test remaining.

I sold a car in December having needed a second test within the two years because of an engine mounting issue. The MOT station had changed ownership since the first test and the new proprietor wiped the previous advisories as he felt they were insignificant.

^{_{Subscribers  do not see these advertisements}}

 

[ontheroadagain]

First mot is already at 4 years in Northern Ireland and yearly thereafter. Mot’s here are carried out at Government testing centres. It is a stricter test than the “garage” tests in England and if your car fails you have to book a return visit and come back at a later date.

 

[gus-lopez]

It is 4 years from new here for cars then every 2 years up to ten then yearly. Apart from cars that were formerly rentals they need a test every 6 months .
Vans are 2 years from new here then yearly up to 10 then 6 monthly from then on.
Except if they have windows/rear seats then it is 2 years from new, then yearly.
Tests here are at gov .es approved centres that do nothing else & have no interest in repairs.

 

[Gromett]

There is no MOT for the first 3 years? then straight to annual?

I would prefer 2 years then 2 years then annual. 37% of vehicles fail their first MOT. people do high mileage, don't check tires, brakes etc.

 

[AJM2]

Happy with current system. Most new cars have to have services to maintain warranty and these should pick up safety issues in first 3 years. Glad they haven’t extended timescales, it would be a recipe for disaster IMO

 

[busby]

I was aware it has been muted for some time that the Government was considering various radical changes to the MOT process, for example: only testing private new vehicles when 4 years old rather than 3. And then ongoing MOTs only required every 2 years.

Well apparently that has all been scrapped, and the existing arrangements are to remain in place for now. Not sure if this news has already been posted, but I couldn't see it.

Details in the Honest John link:

http://tinyurl.com/ytka382y

If it ain't broke why mend it..Good news.BUSBY..

^{_{Subscribers  do not see these advertisements}}

 

[Tea Bag]

Hi.
We have to go to DEKRA testing station at Tondela... they " ONLY do testing "every two years. It works so simply,it passes or it fails. When i came out last time after having paid,i nipped back in and asked were there any advisories.. the chap shrugged and said. " It has passed ". I can handle that.
Tea Bag

 

[Roby2008]

We have 3 years then 2 years in Germany, the Gas check is every 2 years, so after 2 years in a new MH, you need a visit to the TÜV station every year for something..

 

[rod_vw]

And in the UK if the vehicle is over 40yrs old there is no MOT requirement, unless it has been radically mechanically modified from original design.

 

[Northernraider]

I'd have preferred every 2 years .. its my main restriction for longterm travel .

 

[The Old Man]

I have found that the testers can exercise a fair measure of discretion, especially if you are selling a vehicle as, by law, it has to have 18 months test remaining.

I sold a car in December having needed a second test within the two years because of an engine mounting issue. The MOT station had changed ownership since the first test and the new proprietor wiped the previous advisories as he felt they were insignificant.

Very French!

^{_{Subscribers  do not see these advertisements}}

 

[ontheroadagain]

I'd have preferred every 2 years .. its my main restriction for longterm travel .

You could always buy something older that is exempt.
How about this?

Bedford OL ‘Montys camper ‘ | eBay

Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Bedford OL ‘Montys camper ‘ at the best online prices at eBay! Free delivery for many products.

www.ebay.co.uk

 

[Northernraider]

You could always buy something older that is exempt.
How about this?

Bedford OL ‘Montys camper ‘ | eBay

Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Bedford OL ‘Montys camper ‘ at the best online prices at eBay! Free delivery for many products.

www.ebay.co.uk

Yes that's my longterm plan. When the right thing comes up.

That truck is a beauty

 

[cyberyacht]

When originally introduced it was ten years old and later reduced to five before the current regime. You'd think with modern build techniques, it would be safe to extend the frequency a bit but, of course, you can't rely on people taking care of their vehicles.

 

[Northernraider]

When originally introduced it was ten years old and later reduced to five before the current regime. You'd think with modern build techniques, it would be safe to extend the frequency a bit but, of course, you can't rely on people taking care of their vehicles.

Yet many other countries in Europe have 2 year gaps. I think once again the UK view is making

 

[SpeedyDux]

When originally introduced it was ten years old and later reduced to five before the current regime. You'd think with modern build techniques, it would be safe to extend the frequency a bit but, of course, you can't rely on people taking care of their vehicles.

The vast majority of new cars appear to be on 3 year PCP or lease. The first keeper hands them back and gets another new one. In my mind it is not a coincidence that there is a high failure rate at the car's first MOT. People who actually own their car from new and want to keep it for longer probably take better care of it and worry that it might not pass that first MOT.

^{_{Subscribers  do not see these advertisements}}

 

[Stoosal]

Three biggest causes of vehicle failing its first mot:

indicators/lights
tyres
window wipers

 

[fat haggis]

Yes that's my longterm plan. When the right thing comes up.

That truck is a beauty

Try this one tam.

 

[BikerGraham]

Three biggest causes of vehicle failing its first mot:

indicators/lights
tyres
window wipers

Classic failure points for testers.

My GLC last MOT passed but had 3 advisories.

One was the old chestnut of the under engine plastic cover / tray that obscures views. Yet no other MOT tester has mentioned it on this car

Second one was worn wiper blade. Well it had recently been changed and when checked afterwards worked perfectly. No streaks etc so couldn’t rectify it as there wasn’t a problem

Third was worn front nearside tyre, close to limit. It’s only done 5000miles since new and it still had 7mm of tread across the surface all around when checked afterwards. Same as other tyres. So wouldn’t replace it as nothing wrong with it.

My garage take it somewhere else to MOT. So Told them just as well it had been passed and said not to use them again.

 

[nicholsong]

And in the UK if the vehicle is over 40yrs old there is no MOT requirement, unless it has been radically mechanically modified from original design.

Our MH in Poland is on a 'Veteran' registration(based on a museum's assertion that it has special features - don't ask).

It is only 20 years old but as such does not need an 'MOT'-equivalent in future, but I ask our garage to do the equivalent.

I do not understand the logic of the UK or Polish rules for older vehicles.