So DEFRA commissioned a risk assessment on changing from the old Pet passport scheme to the accommodate the EU harmonisation.
and the report was published in November 2010...
"7.8.2Treatment
Treatment is using a one-off dose of a suitable anthelmintic, such as praziquantel or episantrel. This drug is proven safe, effective and cheap. There are few if any reports of drug resistance or adverse side effects. However, it is preferable that the drug is administered by a vet as the pet passport can then be countersigned and there is less risk of treatment being unsuccessfully administered"
But when the legislation was changed to meet EU harmonisation in July 2011 it became...
"Article 7. 2. The treatment provided for in paragraph 1 shall be administered by a veterinarian"
I don't know about you but I know when and if my dog has taken a tablet and I hate paying 120 Euros for someone to stamp a piece of paper!!!
If you can legislate to make it compulsory for a vet to administer a drug surely you can also fix the price of that work?
and the report was published in November 2010...
"7.8.2Treatment
Treatment is using a one-off dose of a suitable anthelmintic, such as praziquantel or episantrel. This drug is proven safe, effective and cheap. There are few if any reports of drug resistance or adverse side effects. However, it is preferable that the drug is administered by a vet as the pet passport can then be countersigned and there is less risk of treatment being unsuccessfully administered"
But when the legislation was changed to meet EU harmonisation in July 2011 it became...
"Article 7. 2. The treatment provided for in paragraph 1 shall be administered by a veterinarian"
I don't know about you but I know when and if my dog has taken a tablet and I hate paying 120 Euros for someone to stamp a piece of paper!!!
If you can legislate to make it compulsory for a vet to administer a drug surely you can also fix the price of that work?