I recently became exited at the prospect of fitting a rack on the back of our Autotrail Delaware for a scooter to allow us to travel further when on sites. After reading every post I could find on the subject I narrowed my scooter choice down to a Honda 125, with a rack this should be around 170kg.
My first task was to find the length of our overhang. I googled this and ploughed though the 2015 and 2016 specifications to no avail. I then visited our storage site and measured the van. I got 860mm front to front axle, 4440mm front to back axle, and 2400mm back axle to rear. However the spec for the van states the wheelbase is 4300mm and I know the van is 7900mm in length so I settled for 1000mm, 4300mm and 2600mm respectively.
Using the formulas for the effect of an increased load at the back
Front axle: front axle load minus the sum of the new load times the overhang length divided by the wheelbase length.
Rear axle: rear axle load plus the new load plus the sum of the front axle load minus the new front axle load.
This resulted in a decrease of 103kg on the front axle, and an increase of 273kg on the rear axle.
The actual increase on the back axle may be more as I didn’t use the new overhang length including the rack for the calculation.
So, whilst many worries I read about were relating to the possibility of the rack catching on the floor, I cannot see how any motorhome with a large overhang can cope with the added weight on the rear axle of a rack and light motor bike or scooter.
Does this mean that, added to the many 3.5t “overweight’ motorhomes there are also many where the rear axle weight is exceeded?
My first task was to find the length of our overhang. I googled this and ploughed though the 2015 and 2016 specifications to no avail. I then visited our storage site and measured the van. I got 860mm front to front axle, 4440mm front to back axle, and 2400mm back axle to rear. However the spec for the van states the wheelbase is 4300mm and I know the van is 7900mm in length so I settled for 1000mm, 4300mm and 2600mm respectively.
Using the formulas for the effect of an increased load at the back
Front axle: front axle load minus the sum of the new load times the overhang length divided by the wheelbase length.
Rear axle: rear axle load plus the new load plus the sum of the front axle load minus the new front axle load.
This resulted in a decrease of 103kg on the front axle, and an increase of 273kg on the rear axle.
The actual increase on the back axle may be more as I didn’t use the new overhang length including the rack for the calculation.
So, whilst many worries I read about were relating to the possibility of the rack catching on the floor, I cannot see how any motorhome with a large overhang can cope with the added weight on the rear axle of a rack and light motor bike or scooter.
Does this mean that, added to the many 3.5t “overweight’ motorhomes there are also many where the rear axle weight is exceeded?