Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So that will be nearer 40 miles then when fully ladened with all our stuff.Mercedes-Benz Vans. It has a range of up to 93* miles
£38,300 ex. VAT
I wish they would stop messing around producing vans based on ICE chassis. They are never going to reach their full potential.
I am more excited about what Arrival are doing. This is a UK based company producing a vehicle designed from the ground up to be an EV and their primary target is a van that costs the same as an ICE van to buy.
I think they look a hell of a lot better and look more suitable for conversion to a motorhome than the Sprinter base van is.
One drove over my foot when i was 14. Wish i could say that i never heard it coming but I jumped out of it to make a delivery. Ours frequently went flat before we finished the round...always late for school.The world is changing! Now, what happened to electric milk floats??
I would expect it to be slightly better aerodynamically than any A class or C class with overcab bed and slightly worse than a standard PVC.I really dont like the look or the shape though compared with an ICE panel van. They dont look very aerodynamic.
I just went looking to see if they have published their Cd value for the van. They haven't but having received a 10,000 unit order they have altered the design to make it more aerodynamic.I really dont like the look or the shape though compared with an ICE panel van. They dont look very aerodynamic.
I just went looking to see if they have published their Cd value for the van. They haven't but having received a 10,000 unit order they have altered the design to make it more aerodynamic.
Arrival's Electric Van Inches Closer To Production As Startup Unveils Revised Beta Prototype | Carscoops
The Arrival Van will go on sale in the first quarter of 2022www.carscoops.com
This may be more to your liking?
View attachment 438057
They look like something from postman Pat.I really dont like the look or the shape though compared with an ICE panel van. They dont look very aerodynamic.
Why make the A pillar so thick? Good designers should get all the necessary structural strength using the B pillar allowing a slim A pillar for better and safer visibility for the driver.I just went looking to see if they have published their Cd value for the van. They haven't but having received a 10,000 unit order they have altered the design to make it more aerodynamic.
Arrival's Electric Van Inches Closer To Production As Startup Unveils Revised Beta Prototype | Carscoops
The Arrival Van will go on sale in the first quarter of 2022www.carscoops.com
This may be more to your liking?
View attachment 438057
A pillar seems normal size to me.Why make the A pillar so thick? Good designers should get all the necessary structural strength using the B pillar allowing a slim A pillar for better and safer visibility for the driver.
Note the cameras instead of mirrors. Not yet convinced this is an improvement (raindrops distort the image) albeit that can provide better aerodynamics.
Sprinter is £44,000 plus vat. After grant.Mercedes-Benz Vans. It has a range of up to 93* miles
£38,300 ex. VAT
"Normal" does not equate to best design practice. If you do it right the forward angle of view can increase from about 69 to 90 degrees, a big difference. You complained about EV vans being based on ICE platforms. Well, here is an example of follow-the-herd body design based on ICE van bodies. Could do a lot better.A pillar seems normal size to me.
Cameras are good for visibility and aerodynamic. raindrop issue doesn't strike me as an issue.
It is a structural component. Making it thinner will compromise integrity in the case of a crash. Do you think they design them with these posts for fun? If they could make them smaller I am sure they would have done by now even if just to save money."Normal" does not equate to best design practice. If you do it right the forward angle of view can increase from about 69 to 90 degrees, a big difference. You complained about EV vans being based on ICE platforms. Well, here is an example of follow-the-herd body design based on ICE van bodies. Could do a lot better.
As for the camera issue I expect they will eventually realise there needs to be a solution to raindrops (and dirt) affecting the quite small lens. Trouble is - that adds cost. Some new trucks have such cameras instead of mirrors so I wonder what solutions they have incorporated. Or not.
Not likely.Wait for the hydrogen campers. They are just around the corner i hope
Not likely.
It is a structural component. Making it thinner will compromise integrity in the case of a crash. Do you think they design them with these posts for fun? If they could make them smaller I am sure they would have done by now even if just to save money.
Don't need to research this, not important. On a minor detail like this I don't really care for one and suspect the manufacturers considered this in the design process.The manufacturer can make the A pillar much thinner while achieving a 5 star NCAP safety rating*. You just haven't researched this, for once. Tsk tsk.
You only have to make the B pillar do more of the structural support. Straightforward engineering.
[*Just like my car in fact. Honda does this. Yes, really.]