- May 12, 2019
- 545
- 796
- Funster No
- 60,781
- MH
- Autotrail Delaware
- Exp
- Years Tugging - Newbie MHing
Pet passport debated Thursday 2nd at 3:00 pm following the petition signatures. Will be on Parliament TV for anyone needing help snoozing
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can someone tell me what this is about, please? Is it applicable for everyone with an EU passport or only for those who live in the UK? Thank you.
Unfortunately a Westminster Hall debate is not nearly the real thing as the HoC.
I admire your optimism.But maybe the first step on a very long and winding road
I admire your optimism.
I looked but I couldn't find any examples of a Westminster Hall debate leading to a change in the law?
Hi Richard. I'm sorry but I can't find anything that says what it's actually about. Can you point me in the right direction, please, or just give me a quick overview? Thank youBroken Link Removed
Hi Richard. I'm sorry but I can't find anything that says what it's actually about. Can you point me in the right direction, please, or just give me a quick overview? Thank you
A petition was started (several of us signed it), and with 100,000 signatures should be debated by Parliament. The petition was “should UK rejoin the EU pet passport scheme” (not sure how that could work personally though). My wife (who also signed the petition) received an email this am saying it was to be debated, I thought it was in Parliament, but perhaps rb62 knows better?Hi Richard. I'm sorry but I can't find anything that says what it's actually about. Can you point me in the right direction, please, or just give me a quick overview? Thank you
A petition was started (several of us signed it), and with 100,000 signatures should be debated by Parliament. The petition was “should UK rejoin the EU pet passport scheme” (not sure how that could work personally though). My wife (who also signed the petition) received an email this am saying it was to be debated, I thought it was in Parliament, but perhaps rb62 knows better?
Fingers crossed it raises the profile of the issue.
The whole Part 1 listed country status should have been settled as part of the original Br*x*t agreement, but the implications of failing to do so were totally overlooked. It would have been very easy for the EU to agree to it then - a minor detail from their point of view. However, with all the blustering that went on about how we would not be adhering to EU standards and reporting requirements with regard to animal health, they probably had little choice but to make us Part 2 listed. Now we have made ourselves very unpopular throughout Europe - to the extent that France in particular is even making it difficult for Brits to obtain EU pet passports. So what incentive do they have to give us Part 1 listing retrospectively?Well from that clip of the transcript it sounds like exactly what we want them to be discussing, and targeting with the EU - is it not?
Hopefully the debate will move things along in that direction!
We got fishSo what incentive do they have to give us Part 1 listing retrospectively?
Clownfish in particular, I believe.We got fish