Even the best snappers tweak their pics. No one is infallible
I like using it for photomerging/ stitching but with good zoom lenses and an extremely good ttl metering system only the occasional tweek is needed.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Even the best snappers tweak their pics. No one is infallible
I use Elements , although not very often, if the picture is right it shouldn't need adjusting :thumb:
Subscribers do not see these advertisements
Not so. Since the days of Louis Daguerre photographers have been manipulating prints as they made them. If you're a perfectionist there is always some improvement to be made.
BINGO.
It's not a new camera Paul needs it's elements. £50 or so and the way to better pictures.
only keep it if its good .
No, keep everything unless they are truly crap
Subscribers do not see these advertisements
Exactly, crapIf out of focus or a bit of camera shake, but these cannot be corrected on Photoshop.
Subscribers do not see these advertisements
I developed and printed most of my pics up to 20 X 16 in mono and colour. There was no photo shop, I had to get it right first time.
Then SWMBO had the final say- I did not need it
terry
Subscribers do not see these advertisements
Oh come on, you Never made a mask or held bit back with your hands while you were enlarging ? Or rubbed a bit of the print when developing to bring a bit more out of an area ?
You must have.
Subscribers do not see these advertisements
My advice would be to buy a quality compact. I would choose one of the canon G series. I have a G9 but I think they are on 11 now. I also have a Canon 5D mk2 which is a superb full frame SLR. The 5D is great but I do a lot with the G9. if I could only have one camera I would choose the compact for pure convenience coupled with a high spec so that if you want to shoot in raw or have complete control with manual you can:thumb:
Subscribers do not see these advertisements
an olympus e450 to get me started
Two of my early digit SLRs were Olympus. Not removable lens but proper through lens viewing. They were seriously good cameras.
For all I said about a little Lumix being good enough, I did forget one thing, viewfinder. It really is a pleasure to use a camera with a proper WYSIWYG viewfinder, essential for moving sports and the like.
But on the whole, a little camera in the pocket, is better than a big one in the boot. Don't give that Lumix away.
Subscribers do not see these advertisements
Subscribers do not see these advertisements
Subscribers do not see these advertisements
I am looking to enhance my already crap photography by purchasing an SLR camera. I don't have a great deal of funds available for this project. Although I love seeing some of the pics on here, I have a decent digital camera with 10x optical zoom. Although the pictures are good, they are not spectacular.
What would take my photography to the next level for a small price?
More photography will make you a better photographer....not a new camera.
A new SLR camera will just make things more complex........good photos
come from seeing what will make a good pic and shooting it ...often quite a few times.
. . . barry
Subscribers do not see these advertisements