Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Subscribers do not see these advertisements
Subscribers do not see these advertisements
If the procedure isn't correct it isn't legal."Procedural impropriety"
So he's not saying he was parked legally then. Just that whoever issued the parking ticket didn't follow the correct procedure.
The man really is a bellend of the highest order isn't he.
For all the good work people like Graham do attempting to work with LAs they are having to deal with this tw@t cancelling out, and even setting back, any progress they might make.
![]()
If the procedure isn't correct it isn't legal.
If they are issuing pcn's without the relevant bye-law covering the class of vehicle then they are committing an offence .
If they are doing it,knowing that it isn't correct ,& by the look of the email that states it from the councillor they are, then he is correcting that they are knowingly committing a fraudulent act.
Subscribers do not see these advertisements
If the councils have got something wrong I would be the first to agree - and didn't shrink from b*ll*cking chief officers who got it wrong when I was working on data protection &c. If they have got it right, though, giving them a hard time does nobody any favours.Any person that gives local councils a hard time is OK in my book.
Procedural impropriety doesn't mean that there isn't a relevant order in place, just that the administrative procedure wasn't followed properly - i.e. some human being made a mistake. From the Broken Link Removed: "Procedural Impropriety - A council’s failure to follow the proper procedure laid down in law for issuing a penalty charge notice or a Notice to Owner."If the procedure isn't correct it isn't legal.
If they are issuing pcn's without the relevant bye-law covering the class of vehicle then they are committing an offence .
If they are doing it,knowing that it isn't correct ,& by the look of the email that states it from the councillor they are, then he is correct in that they are knowingly committing a fraudulent act.
Subscribers do not see these advertisements
No it isn't. His point is that councils keep doing things that he thinks are illegal. If he actually did any proper research and thought outside the box of his ignorant prejudices against the public sector then he would see how wrong he is.I think you need to read the background to all of this, his point is that the council keep issuing penalty notices to Motorhomes for parking in areas which say no parking (for motorhomes) when the no parking signs themselves are illegal and unenforceable, or something along
those lines!
I think you need to read the background to all of this, his point is that the council keep issuing penalty notices to Motorhomes for parking in areas which say no parking (for motorhomes) when the no parking signs themselves are illegal and unenforceable, or something along
those lines!
Subscribers do not see these advertisements
I could agree with this if it wasn't for the fact that he has won 3 appeals and as far as I am aware no one has actually argued that the signage etc is correct. Anyhow, I think I should be allowed to park my Motorhome anywhere, ya boo sucks!!No it isn't. His point is that councils keep doing things that he thinks are illegal. If he actually did any proper research and thought outside the box of his ignorant prejudices against the public sector then he would see how wrong he is.
& this appears to be the reply to himDon't shoot the messenger!
You guys can rant all you like, I bet there are many people on this forum who have been at the receiving end of a Councils "procedural impropriety" he's pointing it out to them, and as for
I could agree with this if it wasn't for the fact that he has won 3 appeals and as far as I am aware no one has actually argued that the signage etc is correct. Anyhow, I think I should be allowed to park my Motorhome anywhere, ya boo sucks!!![]()
Procedural impropriety has absolutely nothing to do with any signage. It is some sort of problem with the procedure followed in the issuance of the ticket. As Nick pointed out earlier, the recipient of the ticket was probably parked illegally but got away with it because of something like the ticket not being either filled out or presented incorrectly - i.e. he parked with no consideration for others or the effect on them but wasn't big enough to hold up his hands when caught.Don't shoot the messenger!
You guys can rant all you like, I bet there are many people on this forum who have been at the receiving end of a Councils "procedural impropriety" he's pointing it out to them, and as for
I could agree with this if it wasn't for the fact that he has won 3 appeals and as far as I am aware no one has actually argued that the signage etc is correct. Anyhow, I think I should be allowed to park my Motorhome anywhere, ya boo sucks!!![]()
Notice how that cr*p has been edited to pretend that he has won again. The man is a menace.& this appears to be the reply to him
![]()
about this
![]()
from here ;
https://andystrangeway.wordpress.com/
just below halfway
Subscribers do not see these advertisements