This got complicated quickly!!
Mike.
At 60 posts in I’d call it a slow burner (no batteries were harmed in the writing of this post).

Ian
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This got complicated quickly!!
Mike.
Firstly, I’d like to thank gus-lopez for the inspiration.
That’s certainly not the case in the narrowboat world. There, the hybrid bank (entirely separate from the engine battery) uses no B2B; the LiFePO4 battery and the lead acid battery are both connected directly to the alternator.
The B2B will certainly fulfill that role provided that the current is limited to a level that is appropriate to the alternator; if not, the alternator would still overheat.
Not necessarily, there’s more than one way to limit the current being drawn from the alternator. One, simple, first principles, method is to add resistance to the charge path. This can be achieved by increasing the length of the alternator cable (thereby adding resistance); problem solved.
Wise move! Clearly, you had no/insufficient means of limiting the current draw - see above.
If you’re referring to the Victron video, that has been debunked many times. It was an unrealistic test designed to destroy the alternator.
Indeed.
It is why they charge more quickly, irrespective of the charge source.
that rather depends on which boats you compare them with.
A spilt charge system simply connects the starter and leisure batteries together when the engine is running. And, yes, usually, as soon as LiFePO4 batteries are used as the leisure bank a B2B is fitted to:
- provide an appropriate charge profile
- limit the current drawn
- protect against a BMS disconnect spike that would damage the alternator (this function is performed by the lead acid battery in a hybrid bank)
No, you are not describing a hybrid bank, you are describing a conventional LiFePO4 installation.
It protects against a voltage spike not excess current.
There is no voltage spike/excess current when a B2B is fitted.
Without suitable protection, that is a risk.
The LiFePO4 will also supply the large loads.
Indeed it does.
No, because of its lower internal resistance, the LiFePO4 battery charges first (and quickly).
Indeed it does.
It’s ideal for all loads and is indeed perfectly happy to sit in a partial SoC.
Indeed it does.
Indeed it does but not because it charges preferentially but because the LiFePO4 charges preferentially and whose voltage rises to a level that will allow a trickle charge through to the lead acid battery. Once the LiFePO4 is fully charged the lead acid will complete its charge cycle.
Well, he is wrong then.
AI (and Google) are wonderful resources but they are often inaccurate.
As I said earlier, not in the narrowboat world it isn’t.
Ian
Mr Lopez is the undisputed king of the multi-quote response.what was the nature of the inspiration provided to you by Mr Lopez?
Blimey you been taking quote lessons off Gus LopezFirstly, I’d like to thank gus-lopez for the inspiration.
That’s certainly not the case in the narrowboat world. There, the hybrid bank (entirely separate from the engine battery) uses no B2B; the LiFePO4 battery and the lead acid battery are both connected directly to the alternator.
The B2B will certainly fulfill that role provided that the current is limited to a level that is appropriate to the alternator; if not, the alternator would still overheat.
Not necessarily, there’s more than one way to limit the current being drawn from the alternator. One, simple, first principles, method is to add resistance to the charge path. This can be achieved by increasing the length of the alternator cable (thereby adding resistance); problem solved.
Wise move! Clearly, you had no/insufficient means of limiting the current draw - see above.
If you’re referring to the Victron video, that has been debunked many times. It was an unrealistic test designed to destroy the alternator.
Indeed.
It is why they charge more quickly, irrespective of the charge source.
that rather depends on which boats you compare them with.
A spilt charge system simply connects the starter and leisure batteries together when the engine is running. And, yes, usually, as soon as LiFePO4 batteries are used as the leisure bank a B2B is fitted to:
- provide an appropriate charge profile
- limit the current drawn
- protect against a BMS disconnect spike that would damage the alternator (this function is performed by the lead acid battery in a hybrid bank)
No, you are not describing a hybrid bank, you are describing a conventional LiFePO4 installation.
It protects against a voltage spike not excess current.
There is no voltage spike/excess current when a B2B is fitted.
Without suitable protection, that is a risk.
The LiFePO4 will also supply the large loads.
Indeed it does.
No, because of its lower internal resistance, the LiFePO4 battery charges first (and quickly).
Indeed it does.
It’s ideal for all loads and is indeed perfectly happy to sit in a partial SoC.
Indeed it does.
Indeed it does but not because it charges preferentially but because the LiFePO4 charges preferentially and whose voltage rises to a level that will allow a trickle charge through to the lead acid battery. Once the LiFePO4 is fully charged the lead acid will complete its charge cycle.
Well, he is wrong then.
AI (and Google) are wonderful resources but they are often inaccurate.
As I said earlier, not in the narrowboat world it isn’t.
Ian
Can I also get rid of the lead acid battery from that charging setup, and just connect directly from alternator to the B2B charger?
If you have a lead acid leisure battery connected directly in parallel with your LiFePO4 battery then it is not required if you use a B2B.
Ian
PS I think that we have drifted this thread much too far already.
That google AI crap will have people believe anything these days, it was bad enough just google but jeeps AI puts anything up.yup, google is always right, isn't it
I've been running a Lead/Lithium mix for over 4 years now, and I have supplied a special controller of my own design to optimize the combination to people virtually all over the world for their own Hybrid setups.
Fogstar Drift?If you have a lead acid leisure battery connected directly in parallel with your LiFePO4 battery then it is not required if you use a B2B.
Ian
PS I think that we have drifted this thread much too far already.
Must be the Fogstar drift pro for how far threads drift lolFogstar Drift?
Mike.
Firstly, I’d like to thank gus-lopez for the inspiration.
That’s certainly not the case in the narrowboat world. There, the hybrid bank (entirely separate from the engine battery) uses no B2B; the LiFePO4 battery and the lead acid battery are both connected directly to the alternator.
The B2B will certainly fulfill that role provided that the current is limited to a level that is appropriate to the alternator; if not, the alternator would still overheat.
Not necessarily, there’s more than one way to limit the current being drawn from the alternator. One, simple, first principles, method is to add resistance to the charge path. This can be achieved by increasing the length of the alternator cable (thereby adding resistance); problem solved.
Wise move! Clearly, you had no/insufficient means of limiting the current draw - see above.
If you’re referring to the Victron video, that has been debunked many times. It was an unrealistic test designed to destroy the alternator.
Indeed.
It is why they charge more quickly, irrespective of the charge source.
that rather depends on which boats you compare them with.
A spilt charge system simply connects the starter and leisure batteries together when the engine is running. And, yes, usually, as soon as LiFePO4 batteries are used as the leisure bank a B2B is fitted to:
- provide an appropriate charge profile
- limit the current drawn
- protect against a BMS disconnect spike that would damage the alternator (this function is performed by the lead acid battery in a hybrid bank)
No, you are not describing a hybrid bank, you are describing a conventional LiFePO4 installation.
It protects against a voltage spike not excess current.
There is no voltage spike/excess current when a B2B is fitted.
Without suitable protection, that is a risk.
The LiFePO4 will also supply the large loads.
Indeed it does.
No, because of its lower internal resistance, the LiFePO4 battery charges first (and quickly).
Indeed it does.
It’s ideal for all loads and is indeed perfectly happy to sit in a partial SoC.
Indeed it does.
Indeed it does but not because it charges preferentially but because the LiFePO4 charges preferentially and whose voltage rises to a level that will allow a trickle charge through to the lead acid battery. Once the LiFePO4 is fully charged the lead acid will complete its charge cycle.
Well, he is wrong then.
AI (and Google) are wonderful resources but they are often inaccurate.
As I said earlier, not in the narrowboat world it isn’t.
Ian
You need a Battery at the 'alternator end' if you are using a B2B Charger. If you got rid of the Battery, then you would need to change your B2B to an A2B - An Alternator to Battery Charger....
Thanks also for the clarification about not needing a Sterling alternator protector if I have a B2B, that is really helpful.
Can I also get rid of the lead acid battery from that charging setup, and just connect directly from alternator to the B2B charger?
You need a Battery at the 'alternator end' if you are using a B2B Charger. If you got rid of the Battery, then you would need to change your B2B to an A2B - An Alternator to Battery Charger
And yes, there is such a thing. I think the most common one in made by Sterling Power, is not very good by all accounts AND is pretty expensive compared to a comparable B2B. As far as I can tell, most folk with boats who install Lithium (or add Lithium or their 'house' Lead to make a Hybrid Bank) and wish to be able to limit the current load on their dedicated house alternator will actually introduce a Lead Acid battery at the alternator end in order to be able to use a B2B rather than having to get an A2B.
We didn't on our last van and no problem. OK maybe not ideal with less output but it all worked with just changing the solar controller to lithium and mains charger to gel.All this talk of B2B's. If you don't have a smart alternator, do you need one?
All this talk of B2B's. If you don't have a smart alternator, do you need one?
I don't get the overstress alternator bit. If your set up say outputs 20a whatever battery you have it won't give more but if I fit a B2B at 50a it surely puts more stress on the alternator. Whatever you have it's the same alternator doing the work a B2B doesn't change that.It depends on whether you need to limit the current draw and that depends on the wiring on your van.
The risk if you don’t fit one is that you over stress your alternator (potentially damaging it) and/or overheat your wiring (with the attendant fire risk).
But you might not need one.
I hope that helps.
Ian
If you have no means of limiting the current drawn by a LiFePO4 battery, the alternator will get stressed.I don't get the overstress alternator bit.
The output available depends on two things:If your set up say outputs 20a whatever battery you have it won't give more
The more current you demand the harder the alternator will work. Some B2Bs have the ability to limit the current drawn. But, remember, this discussion is related to the potential impact of NOT fitting a B2B.but if I fit a B2B at 50a it surely puts more stress on the alternator.
No, but compared with not fitting a B2B the alternator may be trying to deliver its max output.Whatever you have it's the same alternator doing the work a B2B doesn't change that.
Indeed it should.I know lithium can draw much more than a lead acid and wiring etc should be checked
You must just be lucky then I guess.I just dropped a lithium in made the changes and got up to about 20a going in the same as a lead acid.
Nope informed decision, all scared mongering IMHO. But based on the van I had and equipment fitted and talking to the battery maker.If you have no means of limiting the current drawn by a LiFePO4 battery, the alternator will get stressed.
The output available depends on two things:
If you connect a LiFePO4 without a B2B connected then you may be asking for more than the alternator can sustain.
- The demand from the load
- The maximum output capability of the supply
The more current you demand the harder the alternator will work. Some B2Bs have the ability to limit the current drawn. But, remember, this discussion is related to the potential impact of NOT fitting a B2B.
No, but compared with not fitting a B2B the alternator may be trying to deliver its max output.
Indeed it should.
You must just be lucky then I guess.
Ian
Nope informed decision, all scared mongering IMHO. But based on the van I had and equipment fitted and talking to the battery maker.
I wanted to try it as B2B were more expensive then but it all worked so no need to change.Great stuff.
Your initial response suggested a much more casual approach than the considered approach you describe above.
Ian
Its not hard Dethleffs are doing the same as Hymer and utilising the BOS LE 300 in this linkWe will be picking up our new van soon. It has an AGM battery fitted under the seat and space to add a 2nd battery.
In general, how difficult is it to add the 2nd lithium battery in the space provided at a later date? Is it something an user can do themselves.
The van is a Dethleffs.
I wanted to try it as B2B were more expensive then but it all worked so no need to change.
It all went thru the EBL.It is entirely doable if there is sufficient resistance in the charge path. The ‘long lead’ method (used by narrow boaters) that I have discussed elsewhere is used simply to add resistance into the charge path. However, it is important to understand the issues associated with this approach in order that you can put necessary mitigations in place in the event that operating envelopes are challenged.
You have, effectively, a hybrid battery bank whereby your engine battery is connected in parallel with your LiFePO4 leisure bank. Having your engine battery in parallel (via the split charge relay) with your LiFePO4 battery provides spike protection for your alternator in the event that the BMS disconnects the charge source when the OVP (over voltage protection) activates.
Ian
Is the split charge relay internal to the EBL?It all went thru the EBL.
Yes I think it was and it was for 2 AGM batteries.Is the split charge relay internal to the EBL?
Ian
The EBL will limit the charge to usually 18A, so adding Lithium will not create an issue on alternator overload.
Why pay 500 or so for something I didnt need. Never ran out of power in 4 years and never used a mains charger.The EBL will limit the charge to usually 18A, so adding Lithium will not create an issue on alternator overload.
However, a major benefit of Lithium (possible THE key benefit) is the ability to charge the batteries faster, so by keeping with the EBL is, IMO , a flawed decision. But each to their own.
That is how it is designed. if you want more info, I suppose speak to Schaudt/Lippert?Out of interest, how does it limit the charge to 18A?
Ian