- Nov 19, 2019
- 793
- 2,605
- Funster No
- 66,935
- MH
- Challenger 287GA
- Exp
- Since 2020
So today marked the beginning of the "serious" stage of our search...we went to view our first camper with the possibility of buying. It was a nice little 1997 <Broken link removed>. Was a long drive to go view it, around 4.5 hours each way due to some major, unavoidable roadworks, but well worth the drive. We were amazed at how TARDIS-like it felt. The van is only just over 5m in length, so shorter than the majority of PVC's on the market, but due to the height it felt suprisingly spacious inside. We also were impressed by the roomy and airy feel of the overcab bed, I think the three windows and high ceilings really helped in this regard. The bathroom passed the "sit on the throne with a book" test as well as the imaginary shower test as well. A really cracking little van from my inexperienced point of view!!
"So, did you buy it then RO?" I hear you ask??!! Well.....no, we didn't, and i'll explain why...For us it was too compromised. If we consider it for just me and SWMBO, then there are significantly cheaper options around as we wouldn't need 4 seaat-belts. If we consider it for us and the 2 kids (even though our plan would be to take a smallish throw up tent for site use) then the second bed/table arrangement is simply too cramped. My 13 year old daughter is nearly 5'10" already, and our son is shooting up by the day, so even for an overnight aire stop on the way to somewhere, it's simply too cramped. So thank you all for the invaluable advice to look, look and look again. While the shows are fantastic and really interesting, the fact is that layouts have changed over the years, and due to our budget, we have to look at an older van with an older style layout. This showed us a lot of things that we like and maybe more importantly, some we didn't.
Next stop, an older style bunk-bed van, maybe around 6 metres, with the beds down the rear drivers side. Let the hunt commence!!
"So, did you buy it then RO?" I hear you ask??!! Well.....no, we didn't, and i'll explain why...For us it was too compromised. If we consider it for just me and SWMBO, then there are significantly cheaper options around as we wouldn't need 4 seaat-belts. If we consider it for us and the 2 kids (even though our plan would be to take a smallish throw up tent for site use) then the second bed/table arrangement is simply too cramped. My 13 year old daughter is nearly 5'10" already, and our son is shooting up by the day, so even for an overnight aire stop on the way to somewhere, it's simply too cramped. So thank you all for the invaluable advice to look, look and look again. While the shows are fantastic and really interesting, the fact is that layouts have changed over the years, and due to our budget, we have to look at an older van with an older style layout. This showed us a lot of things that we like and maybe more importantly, some we didn't.
Next stop, an older style bunk-bed van, maybe around 6 metres, with the beds down the rear drivers side. Let the hunt commence!!