Ivory55
Free Member
On look north local news this morning. The council is to employ private security firms to stop people camping over night in coastal car parks. I think some people were practically living there , only their self to blame.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
France and the UK are different in many ways. Development of use of caravans and motorhomes is just one of them.It does seem that councils miss out on initiative and enterprise. France on the other hand seem able to cash in on Motorhomers needs and find land to create parking Aires and make a profit. Everyone wins.
1. Very few people are actually prepared to put the effort in to prove that need.In the UK there are Motorhomes with a need to stop, shops and Councils with a need for money yet unable to square this conundrum,
Which simply illustrates that motorhome owners are only one of several competing interests. Councils have a duty to balance those competing interests. Having received objections the council could not simply go ahead willy nilly.Weymouth almost (almost) managed to get an Aire but sadly failed at the last meeting where Campsites thought they would lose money.
See several posts on the EUWhy oh why do we always follow France and not take the lead.
I think you may be on the wrong forum.Free campers (loaders) are like ants, once one finds a new spot it goes back to the nest and passes on the news and the next thing you know the place is infested with them.
Lincolnshire has mile after mile of deserted Beaches and at certain points the local Council has spent local Council Tax payers money on small parking areas so that all can enjoy the beach away from the bustle of the resorts.
Free campers (loaders) have found the best ones and spend long weekends or more on them. Thus denying daily visitors, parking spots and leaving a mess for the council to clear up.
These places are for the pleasure of all and not for the selfish few, so I applaud the local council for their actions.
I think you may be on the wrong forum.
Whilst I have only been a day tripper, this subject is one of my `pet bugbears` from Lincolnshire County and East Lindsey Councils. I have for many years travelled to Huttoft and Moggs Eye/Marsh Yard and enjoyed the beaches there. No hassle or vandalism from the MH community using the area just help given when I was asked and conversations enjoyed - that is until the Council decided to put up height barriers at both sites. These were repeatedly `torn down` by persons unknown.On look north local news this morning. The council is to employ private security firms to stop people camping over night in coastal car parks. I think some people were practically living there , only their self to blame.
There are half a dozen car/coach parks in East Lindsay district (including one in Skegness) where motorhomes may be parked, in addition to on street parking.East Lindsey Council (Skegness) have now erected height barriers at the car parks that were affected by the travellers. They say there are still places where it is possible to park a motorhome on street.
The last case of those taken to court for parking at Huttoft is to be heard on Thursday.
Other legislation is used for traffic/parking orders so whether the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act would be used (or could be used) is theoretical at the moment. That story seemed rather strange to me when I read it this morning. The very nature of legislation which is applied at a local, rather than national, level (in order to respond to specific local requirements) is that it results in differences between areas (not discrepancies).It will be interesting to see what powers the parking enforcers will have. A lot of discussion on the news today about councils using new powers under new anti social behaviour legislation , see here .. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-32109545
There's nothing wrong with employing someone to collect money &c but actually making money is a different matter. 24 hour facilities require 24 hour management, whether that be people, alarms or whatever. Places like Huttoft are fairly remote so that means some sort of hut or other accommodation & facilities for the employees, which costs money. Without real evidence that sufficient revenue could be generated to cover the expense, councils are almost bound to err on the side of caution.I do realise that this topic has been discussed many times on all forums and make no apologies for raising it again.
Why do Aires work in France?
If we would like Aires or their equivalent in the UK, we must keep this topic alive or nobody will do anything about it ever.
What on earth is wrong employing someone to collect money and act as a guardian for a prime site.... to actually make money hopefully.
Alternatively, again in France, there are sites where machines control gated Aires. To enter you must swipe a card, so no cash to steal.
Houses can be alarmed so I am sure vandalism could be limited by alarmed facilities.
I could go on but feel my text is wasted if I am the only one who cares.
Alan