PeteH
Free Member
- Nov 22, 2007
- 6,853
- 9,030
- Funster No
- 900
- MH
- Rapido, 999M.
- Exp
- 18+yrs plus 25+Towing
Been looking into getting some travel insurance cover online, so went on a well known "Over 50`s" site to see what the potential cost would be. I had a query about an operation carried out about 18 months back and now fully discharged. This site has a "Chat" facility, so I woke it up and went "Chatting" the result:- ( it`s verbatim so the spelling is uncorrected)
(ME)- Hi. Have a query over declared medical conditions. Does a condition for which there is a Medical discharge confirmation still need to be declared?
Jae: Good evening
→Yes?
Jae: anything that you have suffered form/seen someone about or taken anything for in the last 2 years needs to be declared
→Even if it has been operated for and the patient is now discharged?
Jae: yes
→So every bout of cold or flu? ( I was being mischievous but did not expect this answer)
Jae: yes if you have siffered form this in the last 2 years
→How can this be? can you remember every ache and pain for which yoy may have been given a short course of (say) antibiotic, and for which a full recovery has been made. That would not only impractical but will take about 6 months to complete for the average customer?
Jae: you would be able to obtain this information from your GP
→In a purely practical sense. I can see the UK`s overwhelmed Medical system being very grateful for that request from every traveller who wishes to go on holiday. Surely you are joking?
Jae: if you are unable to provide us with a full medical declaration it may result in claims being declined as a result of missed information, the receptionist should be able to provide you with the information
→If I was a betting man. I would wager that this type of request is probably a breach of the unfair terms clauses in the unfair contract legislation?. I will probabaly have to consult with Trading Standards. to ascertain this.
→ Thank you and have a nice day.
I was about to sign off when this reply came:-
Jae: If you are happy you can provide the information to the best of your knowledge then you can book a policy but we ask that anything is declared from the last 2 years, some of our customer prefer to obtain the information from their GP
→I cannot see the need to have a record of every sneeze and cold etc. but OK major stuff requiring hospital clinical attendance OK the rest is IMV just Bureaucratic Nonsense.
Jae: this is the information our underwriters request i'm afraid to ensure you obtain full cover
→I will have to reconsider, as I cannot see the pint of typing up screeds JUST to get cover.
→Anyway as I said earlier have a good day Bye.
Jae: have a good evening
→Yes I have transcribed this, for future reference cheers (End of "Chat")
Opinions please?.
My take would be extreme "botty covering". But on a serious note if you break something serious and have to be medi evacued , then the fact that you where treat for (say) Herpes (cold sores), but hadn't said, after all most kids get a cold sore? and parents don't think twice about it. Could be reason to refuse cover?. Thereby saving (them) thousands?. Is that reasonable?.
What is being said effectively is that unless YOU declare every "sniffle" you are NOT guaranteed cover if the worst happens?. Surely, there has to be "reason" in this?. Or will it take a Court Action and Parliamentary changes to clarify?.
(ME)- Hi. Have a query over declared medical conditions. Does a condition for which there is a Medical discharge confirmation still need to be declared?
Jae: Good evening
→Yes?
Jae: anything that you have suffered form/seen someone about or taken anything for in the last 2 years needs to be declared
→Even if it has been operated for and the patient is now discharged?
Jae: yes
→So every bout of cold or flu? ( I was being mischievous but did not expect this answer)
Jae: yes if you have siffered form this in the last 2 years
→How can this be? can you remember every ache and pain for which yoy may have been given a short course of (say) antibiotic, and for which a full recovery has been made. That would not only impractical but will take about 6 months to complete for the average customer?
Jae: you would be able to obtain this information from your GP
→In a purely practical sense. I can see the UK`s overwhelmed Medical system being very grateful for that request from every traveller who wishes to go on holiday. Surely you are joking?
Jae: if you are unable to provide us with a full medical declaration it may result in claims being declined as a result of missed information, the receptionist should be able to provide you with the information
→If I was a betting man. I would wager that this type of request is probably a breach of the unfair terms clauses in the unfair contract legislation?. I will probabaly have to consult with Trading Standards. to ascertain this.
→ Thank you and have a nice day.
I was about to sign off when this reply came:-
Jae: If you are happy you can provide the information to the best of your knowledge then you can book a policy but we ask that anything is declared from the last 2 years, some of our customer prefer to obtain the information from their GP
→I cannot see the need to have a record of every sneeze and cold etc. but OK major stuff requiring hospital clinical attendance OK the rest is IMV just Bureaucratic Nonsense.
Jae: this is the information our underwriters request i'm afraid to ensure you obtain full cover
→I will have to reconsider, as I cannot see the pint of typing up screeds JUST to get cover.
→Anyway as I said earlier have a good day Bye.
Jae: have a good evening
→Yes I have transcribed this, for future reference cheers (End of "Chat")
Opinions please?.
My take would be extreme "botty covering". But on a serious note if you break something serious and have to be medi evacued , then the fact that you where treat for (say) Herpes (cold sores), but hadn't said, after all most kids get a cold sore? and parents don't think twice about it. Could be reason to refuse cover?. Thereby saving (them) thousands?. Is that reasonable?.
What is being said effectively is that unless YOU declare every "sniffle" you are NOT guaranteed cover if the worst happens?. Surely, there has to be "reason" in this?. Or will it take a Court Action and Parliamentary changes to clarify?.