Feeling sorry for myself... (1 Viewer)

Dare_Devil_Dennis

Free Member
Apr 22, 2017
296
199
Derby
Funster No
48,269
MH
Coachbuilt
Exp
Newbie
Just heard from the DVLA that I exceeed the minimum standards required for driving my car (newly diagnosed with Glaucoma, Managed & stable). However, I do not meet the tighter requirements for field of vision required for driving lorries and busses, so lose my C1 entitlement.

Now, I must downrate my MH to 3500kg, Having uprated it to 3850kg recently.

What I don't get is...
I am not a bus or lorry driver, so why classify my activities in this way?
I can still drive it when downrated IT'S THE SAME VEHICLE!
I can tow a trailer up to 750kg to carry lost payload, so MGTW will be higher than my current MGVW (can do much more damage with that if I have a RTC).
I can see more out of the cab of my MH than through the screen of my Peugeot 208 (and my neck still swivels to look around).
They created a special category for VED on motorhomes recently, why can't they do the same for us non lorry / bus / minibus drivers just using them for leisure purposes?

Looks like I have to start to paying more VED and carry less.

Woe is me! Anyone got a positive spin on this to cheer me up?
 

Phillybarbour

Free Member
Feb 2, 2013
270
216
West Lancs
Funster No
24,523
MH
Globecar Campscout Revo.
Exp
Since 2010
Sad news for you but they have to set a limit somewhere and its 3500kg in line with Europe. For safety we should not go back to the days on a car driver jumping in a 7500kg (which the limit used to be) vehicle and zooming off with no training.

Hope you sort the downplate and all is ok soon.
 

Langtoftlad

LIFE MEMBER
Apr 12, 2011
8,861
150,720
Langtoft, South Lincs
Funster No
16,024
MH
WildAx Aurora FB [PVC]
Exp
Since 2015
Is a re-assessment of your eyesight/field of vision feasible - would the DVLA reinstate if you scored better ?
 

pappajohn

LIFE MEMBER
Aug 26, 2007
43,323
49,422
Dark side of the moon
Funster No
172
Exp
Since 2005
I appreciate your dilemma but they aren't concerned that your new train weight exceeds your current 3850kg gross weight, moreso that with a C1 licence you COULD drive a 7500kg vehicle, whether you do or not is not their concern but they granted you the right if you so wished.
By reducing you to 3500kg they have taken away the legal possibility of that being available to you.
What is ridiculous, assuming you have a B+E category, is you can now legally drive a 3500kg vehicle and under certain circumstances tow a 6000kg, or even heavier, trailer legally which far exceeds even a pre 1997 C1+E licence.

Subscribers  do not see these advertisements

 
Last edited:
OP
OP
Dare_Devil_Dennis

Dare_Devil_Dennis

Free Member
Apr 22, 2017
296
199
Derby
Funster No
48,269
MH
Coachbuilt
Exp
Newbie
Thanks for the comments, Yes, I could be re-assessed and I will take advice on this from my consultant.
Pappajohn, I understand wht you say, but there is an M1 Special Purpose class of vehicle that our leisure vehicles are classified under. Why not add a new licence class to cover M1 Special purpose vehicles and exclude commercial and paying passenger categories instead of trapping us all in a catch-all set of regulations
 
Aug 6, 2013
11,953
16,570
Kendal, Cumbria
Funster No
27,352
MH
Le-Voyageur RX958 Pl
Exp
since 1999
Thanks for the comments, Yes, I could be re-assessed and I will take advice on this from my consultant.
Pappajohn, I understand wht you say, but there is an M1 Special Purpose class of vehicle that our leisure vehicles are classified under. Why not add a new licence class to cover M1 Special purpose vehicles and exclude commercial and paying passenger categories instead of trapping us all in a catch-all set of regulations
I tend to agree. In fact I believe converters should be lobbying on behalf of their industry and customers instead of turning out barely-legal 3500Kg vans and paring fittings quality to the bone to keep the weight down
 
Oct 8, 2014
1,544
4,565
Todmorden
Funster No
33,748
MH
Compactline 143
Exp
I'm a newbie and always will be. You never know it all.
I also agree, there should be a lobby group the trade in general are turning out M/h that can barely meet the mtpl and the sales then want their cut of the accessory market. There must be thousands of m/h that are well over the limit most of them unwittingly.
A more realistic weight IMHO would be 4 tonne and manufacturers should be forced to weigh and plate every single unit off the production line

Subscribers  do not see these advertisements

 

pappajohn

LIFE MEMBER
Aug 26, 2007
43,323
49,422
Dark side of the moon
Funster No
172
Exp
Since 2005
I understand wht you say, but there is an M1 Special Purpose class of vehicle that our leisure vehicles are classified under. Why not add a new licence class to cover M1 Special purpose vehicles
This category is solely for VED classification and nothing to do with driving licences.
I suspect if the law was changed and m+h were given a licence category of their own it would also involve a specific driving test for the new category in the same way the law has changed regarding C1 (and B) since Jan 1997 and again in 2013.
I suspect the new category would be up to 7500kg as two separate categories for up to 3500kg and up to 7500kg would be no different to what we have today.
The test would be more difficult with LGV style hazard perception tests and health criteria would be at least the same as LGV and probably even more strict due to the average age of m/h drivers, which must be around 65 years old.
My opinion.....Don't rock the boat and wish for something that may be unattainable for many drivers.
 

pappajohn

LIFE MEMBER
Aug 26, 2007
43,323
49,422
Dark side of the moon
Funster No
172
Exp
Since 2005
A more realistic weight IMHO would be 4 tonne and manufacturers should be forced to weigh and plate every single unit off the production line
The problem I see with that is the manufacturers would soon get every van up to that weight and still be left with next to no payload just as they do at present at 3500kg.
 
Oct 8, 2014
1,544
4,565
Todmorden
Funster No
33,748
MH
Compactline 143
Exp
I'm a newbie and always will be. You never know it all.
The problem I see with that is the manufacturers would soon get every van up to that weight and still be left with next to no payload just as they do at present at 3500kg.

Hence the m/h being weighed off the production line, the responsibility would be that of the manufacturer to ensure that no m/h in the new class exceeded for example 3.300k MIRO to include full tank water/fuel and a universal directive on how to define the MIRO.
 

Join us or log in to post a reply.

To join in you must be a member of MotorhomeFun

Join MotorhomeFun

Join us, it quick and easy!

Log in

Already a member? Log in here.

Latest journal entries

Funsters who are viewing this thread

Back
Top