DVLA FINE

Discussion in 'Motorhome Chat' started by TheDentons, Jan 17, 2015.

  1. TheDentons

    TheDentons

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2013
    Messages:
    264
    Location:
    South Wales
    Ratings:
    +156
    Had a nice letter off the DVLA who are claiming £35 because I did not inform them that I had disposed of our old motorhome
    We part exchanged it last year in June through a dealer I don't recall ever having to fill in the V5 in this instance
     
  2. GJH

    GJH Funster Life Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2007
    Messages:
    27,343
    Location:
    Acklam, Teesside, originally Glossop
    Ratings:
    +38,552
    We've always had to fill in part of the V5 when part exchanging a vehicle. A motorhome is no different. The dealer should have made sure you had the correct part to complete and send off.
     
    • Like it Like it x 1
  3. Tootles

    Tootles Funster

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2013
    Messages:
    9,441
    Location:
    Lancaster
    Ratings:
    +46,389
    Write back, and tell them you did. They play this money grabbing game far to frequently. You posted it, not your fault if it didnt arrive. Blame it on the Pony Express, (he said, breaking into song....................................) :):)

     
    • Like it Like it x 6
  4. movan

    movan Funster Life Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Messages:
    15,662
    Location:
    Moving around
    Ratings:
    +46,162
    Wouldn['t normally condone what Toots says, but they fined me once after my road tax disc was stolen when my car broken into. I informed the police and was given crime number and I put note on window 'Tax Disc Stolen.' Since there was only a month left I didn't contact the DVLA as it is now and presumed that the police being notified was all that was needed.

    The DVLA fined me when the police must have notified them .. because I had NOT notified them and thereby not paid a fee for a new tax disc to put on the windscreen. Give the police credit where due, they even tried to help me be excused but to no avail.

    Hopefully the new system is improved .. but it still rankles with me. Don't pay.
     
    • Like it Like it x 3
  5. Tootles

    Tootles Funster

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2013
    Messages:
    9,441
    Location:
    Lancaster
    Ratings:
    +46,389
    I would, (y) He talks a lot of sense!. :)
     
    • Like it Like it x 4
  6. movan

    movan Funster Life Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Messages:
    15,662
    Location:
    Moving around
    Ratings:
    +46,162
    Do you really expect me to agree with you on that? :) xx
     
    • Like it Like it x 4
  7. GJH

    GJH Funster Life Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2007
    Messages:
    27,343
    Location:
    Acklam, Teesside, originally Glossop
    Ratings:
    +38,552
    Do you really expect anybody to agree with you on that? :Eeek:
     
    • Like it Like it x 4
  8. Tootles

    Tootles Funster

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2013
    Messages:
    9,441
    Location:
    Lancaster
    Ratings:
    +46,389
    Yes. (y) I do, and so should you!! Why, I have supported you hill and high water on this very site, you could at least show your gratitude! :)
     
  9. DuxDeluxe

    DuxDeluxe Funster Life Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2008
    Messages:
    9,677
    Location:
    Planet Zog
    Ratings:
    +32,464
    Edited for accuracy (y)
     
    • Like it Like it x 3
  10. gus-lopez

    gus-lopez Funster

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Messages:
    6,835
    Location:
    Lorca,Murcia,Spain
    Ratings:
    +17,676
    Only problem with that is if it has come to light because the dealer has returned the old V5 complete with ALL parts , & that is how they know the OP hasn't sent it off .
    If that's the case could be a problem saying you sent it off.

    Regardless of how you dispòse of a vehicle , one part should always be retained & filled in by the seller/part-exchanger/etc.
     
    • Like it Like it x 1
  11. GJH

    GJH Funster Life Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2007
    Messages:
    27,343
    Location:
    Acklam, Teesside, originally Glossop
    Ratings:
    +38,552
    I still talk to you don't I? Bloomin' 'eck, some people expect the earth :LOL::LOL:
     
  12. Judge Mental

    Judge Mental Funster Deceased RIP

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2009
    Messages:
    6,782
    Location:
    Sarth London
    Ratings:
    +6,694
    to live outside the law you got to be honest

    Bob Dylan
     
    • Like it Like it x 2
  13. pappajohn

    pappajohn Funster Life Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2007
    Messages:
    31,241
    Location:
    YO11 2BD
    Ratings:
    +23,515
    Only works if you have proof of posting... They aren't as daft as they appear.
     
    • Like it Like it x 2
  14. Tootles

    Tootles Funster

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2013
    Messages:
    9,441
    Location:
    Lancaster
    Ratings:
    +46,389
    Not so, Young John. That's out of the window now, in reverse, funny enough. It used to be the catchall excuse for avoiding a speeding fine, however, not any more. The DVLA and Constabulary rules now say that 'pleading non receipt of a speeding fine or excise avoidance notification is not a valid excuse'. So if it's not a valid excuse for you..........(y)(y)

    And also 'Proof of posting cannot be deemed proof of receipt'.
     
    • Like it Like it x 1
  15. Phill D

    Phill D

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2011
    Messages:
    4,414
    Location:
    South Wales
    Ratings:
    +4,660
    DVLA have no idea what the get in the post from one day to the next...:Eeek:
    i sent in a tax disc and a certificate for the change of MGW of my van.... letter back saying that they had received my request and duly completed forms but i had omitted my tax disc and certificate. Which was stapled to the application. :yawn2:

    called them and they said "Ahh!" yes! please write and tell us! :swear2:
     
    • Like it Like it x 1
  16. keith

    keith Funster

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,398
    Location:
    Ecclefechan
    Ratings:
    +1,881
    You couldn't make it up could you?
     
  17. pappajohn

    pappajohn Funster Life Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2007
    Messages:
    31,241
    Location:
    YO11 2BD
    Ratings:
    +23,515
    It appears you are correct.
    once the letter is dropped in the postbox, its deemed delivered and its up to the recipient to prove you didnt post it.

    DSlA will threaten court action if the fine isnt paid but will back down before it gets to court....allegedly.
     
  18. mpdcymru

    mpdcymru Funster

    Joined:
    May 16, 2014
    Messages:
    490
    Location:
    Ammanford
    Ratings:
    +817
    DVLA always used to send summonses etc out recorded delivery. They stopped this practice many years ago and started sending out all such correspondence first class mail. This as because legal opinion (accepted by the magistrates courts) says that sending by first class mail is "good service". I believe the Act in question was the Interpretation Act 1978. Quote this at them if they threaten legal action - it is, I believe, the reason they drop so many cases immediately prior to the court action. Most people don't challenge them of course as they are a Government body which is why they continue to make so much money for the government.
     
    • Like it Like it x 1
Loading...
Similar Threads
  1. tomag
    Replies:
    7
    Views:
    257
  2. StanandShirley
    Replies:
    83
    Views:
    3,591
  3. Jagtazman
    Replies:
    32
    Views:
    1,609
  4. RGR723
    Replies:
    12
    Views:
    617
  5. Tintin
    Replies:
    48
    Views:
    1,653

Share This Page