- Oct 8, 2014
- 1,636
- 3,024
- Funster No
- 33,737
- MH
- Autotrail Excel 600B
- Exp
- Previous VW Camper + Caravan
This is a follow-on to my post below, and as before I will be grateful for any help/advice:
http://www.motorhomefun.co.uk/forum/threads/help-with-btb-charger-wiring-please.117498/
I finally took the plunge and purchased a CTEK D250 Dual, to allow me to fully charge the leisure batteries when driving, and also to accept the solar panels I plan to fit later this year.
Link to CTEK D250 Dual: http://www.ctek.com/Archive/ProductManualPdf/D250S DUAL_EN.pdf
However, I seem to have taken one step forward and two steps back!
I have a 2008 Fiat Ducato based Autotrail Motorhome, fitted with a Sargent EC225 Power supply and EM50 interface unit.
The problem I have is that in order for the CTEK unit to work correctly, I believe that I need to disable the existing connection that charges the leisure battery when the engine is running, and allow it to be charged only from the CTEK D250.
I had hoped that all I needed to do was to remove Fuse #8 in the EM50, and last year when I did that, it seemed to be the case. However, prior to the D250 install, I checked that again, but now find that I am still getting a voltage rise at the leisure batteries when the engine is started.
Link to EM50 Data Sheet: Link Removed
I have had this response from Sargent today "
"As the split charging is a built in function of the main PCB in the EC225, the only way you will be able to disable it without affecting other systems is to use a high current relay to disconnect the vehicle battery supply when the engine is started."
I had come to a similar conclusion myself, but now I need a means to energise the Relay! I will connect the relay in the cable from the EC225 to the leisure batteries, so that it goes "Open Circuit" when the alternator is charging.
Will I have to utilise a "voltage sensing" split charge type relay, or can I use one connected to the Alternator D+ terminal? If I go the D+ route, please can anyone tell me where I can find a connection in the Ducato wiring, other than directly off the difficult-to-access alternator?
Thanks,
John
http://www.motorhomefun.co.uk/forum/threads/help-with-btb-charger-wiring-please.117498/
I finally took the plunge and purchased a CTEK D250 Dual, to allow me to fully charge the leisure batteries when driving, and also to accept the solar panels I plan to fit later this year.
Link to CTEK D250 Dual: http://www.ctek.com/Archive/ProductManualPdf/D250S DUAL_EN.pdf
However, I seem to have taken one step forward and two steps back!
I have a 2008 Fiat Ducato based Autotrail Motorhome, fitted with a Sargent EC225 Power supply and EM50 interface unit.
The problem I have is that in order for the CTEK unit to work correctly, I believe that I need to disable the existing connection that charges the leisure battery when the engine is running, and allow it to be charged only from the CTEK D250.
I had hoped that all I needed to do was to remove Fuse #8 in the EM50, and last year when I did that, it seemed to be the case. However, prior to the D250 install, I checked that again, but now find that I am still getting a voltage rise at the leisure batteries when the engine is started.
Link to EM50 Data Sheet: Link Removed
I have had this response from Sargent today "
"As the split charging is a built in function of the main PCB in the EC225, the only way you will be able to disable it without affecting other systems is to use a high current relay to disconnect the vehicle battery supply when the engine is started."
I had come to a similar conclusion myself, but now I need a means to energise the Relay! I will connect the relay in the cable from the EC225 to the leisure batteries, so that it goes "Open Circuit" when the alternator is charging.
Will I have to utilise a "voltage sensing" split charge type relay, or can I use one connected to the Alternator D+ terminal? If I go the D+ route, please can anyone tell me where I can find a connection in the Ducato wiring, other than directly off the difficult-to-access alternator?
Thanks,
John