Crumple Zone appears to work

sallylillian

LIFE MEMBER
Joined
Oct 29, 2011
Posts
3,945
Likes collected
5,015
Location
Falmouth, Cornwall
Funster No
18,670
MH
Palace Liner 90LO
Exp
2011
No comments about bad parking on the pitch. The crumple zone appears to have protected the driver and passenger although I have no fact to back that up.
1569316761481.png
 
No comments about bad parking on the pitch. The crumple zone appears to have protected the driver and passenger although I have no fact to back that up.
View attachment 334116
Apparently doing 12 mph at point of impact!

Couldn't have been doing a lot more looking at the Sapling that it ran into that is unaffected lol
 
That’s awful... what a sickener!

I wonder how it happened?
 
Apparently doing 12 mph at point of impact!

Couldn't have been doing a lot more looking at the Sapling that it ran into that is unaffected lol
Trees are some of the most unmovable objects at the roadside Eddie, more so than buildings or brick walls.

Having seen the crash testing at Thatcham, a 12mph impact is all it takes to completely deform front crash bars by design. Many vehicles will be total write offs after a 20mph frontal impact due to the designed in deformation of crumple zones.
 
Trees are some of the most unmovable objects at the roadside Eddie, more so than buildings or brick walls.

Having seen the crash testing at Thatcham, a 12mph impact is all it takes to completely deform front crash bars by design. Many vehicles will be total write offs after a 20mph frontal impact due to the designed in deformation of crumple zones.
:reel::giggler:
 
Apparently doing 12 mph at point of impact!

Couldn't have been doing a lot more looking at the Sapling that it ran into that is unaffected lol
Trees don't appear to sustain damage when hit with a vehicle..BUSBY.
 
Interestingly despite the carnage, the Driver seat appears to have survived? hopefully the driver did too? It is a bit extreme as "crash survivability" goes though!.

Subscribers  do not see these advertisements

 
Apparently the driver had not twigged that traffic ahead was stationary and ploughed into the back corner of the truck wiping out his wife in the process.
He survived with minor injuries.

There would appear to only be a bit of fiberglass and a windscreen for frontal protection on that Hymer. :Eeek:
 
Its easy to be crtitical of MH safety but the rear of a truck is tough, they are built to take being backed up against loading bays day after day for years. Look what happens when a truck hits the back of another one. Driver escaped seriously injury miraculously.

1569481196210.png
 
Yes it is easy to be critical of MH safety when it appears that you only have fiberglass and a windscreen for frontal protection in the case of that Hymer, no visual sign of a safety structure to protect the front seat occupants, you can justify that.
 
Is a C class or coachbuilt van with original steel cab any safer? Probably won’t shatter like an A class, but all the stuff in the back would surely move forwards at great speed.
 
I've seen a Transit van less than 18 inches long with two people inside between two lorries, and an XJS less than 2 feet tall with a couple of hands sticking out, amongst many other things during my career. If you have an argument with a lorry, don't think many smaller vehicles will come out of it well ?

Subscribers  do not see these advertisements

 
Not very green, damaging those trees.
 

Join us or log in to post a reply.

To join in you must be a member of MotorhomeFun

Join MotorhomeFun

Join us, it quick and easy!

Log in

Already a member? Log in here.

Latest journal entries

Back
Top