I suspect a large amount of us use Cassoa accredited storage sites to keep our motorhomes safe only to occasionally to hear that vehicles are stolen, even from their 'Gold' level sites.
Does this mean that the accreditation of sites is meaningless? Should we be asking Cassoa to re look at how they make their assessments of individual sites. Ditto we should press site owners to up their game to be ahead of those who want to steal from us. I don't mind paying for the Gold level providing it provides the extra security not just used as a marketing tool.
We should also ask site owners to publish their performance related to break-ins or stolen vehicles, I was only told of several vehicles being stolen during a casual conversation with another motorhome owner at the storage site. Do many site owners report suspicious activity to others within the storage facility - I suspect not.
Can we put pressure on both Cassoa and storage facility owners to up their game - if so how?
Does this mean that the accreditation of sites is meaningless? Should we be asking Cassoa to re look at how they make their assessments of individual sites. Ditto we should press site owners to up their game to be ahead of those who want to steal from us. I don't mind paying for the Gold level providing it provides the extra security not just used as a marketing tool.
We should also ask site owners to publish their performance related to break-ins or stolen vehicles, I was only told of several vehicles being stolen during a casual conversation with another motorhome owner at the storage site. Do many site owners report suspicious activity to others within the storage facility - I suspect not.
Can we put pressure on both Cassoa and storage facility owners to up their game - if so how?