Anyone got any thoughts on these, please solar panel (1 Viewer)

Dec 12, 2010
5,405
21,516
Cumbria
Funster No
14,651
MH
C Class
Exp
since 2011
Polycrystaline aren't as efficient as monocrystaline, other than that, seems plausible.
 
Jan 28, 2008
10,111
18,365
Dovercourt, Harwich, UK
Funster No
1,353
MH
Renalt burstner
Exp
7 years campers before that
flexible panels never have a frame or glass my son has similar on his van and it the only real difference between poly and mono is you need a slightly bigger panel to give the same output
 
OP
OP
chaser
Feb 16, 2013
19,699
51,883
uttoxeter
Funster No
24,713
MH
ambulance conversion
Exp
50 years
Unless someone comes up with really negative reasons against them , I think I'm going to give them a go, leave it a day or two yet in case there's something iv missed.
 

DBK

LIFE MEMBER
Jan 9, 2013
18,009
48,006
Plympton, Devon
Funster No
24,219
MH
PVC, Murvi Morocco
Exp
2013
They look fine. I wouldn't worry about the difference between poly and mono crystalline, the difference between them has narrowed in recent years and in a sense efficiency is a meaningless term when the source of the energy is free. If they are slightly less efficient they will just be a tad bigger to get the same amount of power.

Subscribers  do not see these advertisements

 
Sep 27, 2007
837
289
Shropshire based
Funster No
453
MH
Globecar
Exp
started in 2001
I'm sure I read a post recently were a memebr had recently had them fitted to a newly acquired m/h. in the Nottingham area I think.
 

Join us or log in to post a reply.

To join in you must be a member of MotorhomeFun

Join MotorhomeFun

Join us, it quick and easy!

Log in

Already a member? Log in here.

Funsters who are viewing this thread

Back
Top