Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter James
Its mainly so the person holding the CPC can be held personally responsible for breaking the law in a company when everyone is trying to pass the buck. When they first introduced the exam those who were already working in the transport business could get one free. I know of bent transport company owners who never applied for one even though they could have had one free. They would rather employ a muggins who holds a CPC so he can carry the can if the company is found breaking the law.
|
Hi Peter,
Don't confuse CPC (for operators' licensing purposes) with the driver CPC.
They are two different things, its just that the driver CPC is badly named, hence the confusion.
Anyone holding a vocational or LGV entitlement on 10 Sept 09 has 5 years in which to do the required 35 hours training.
Whether vehicles are driven on C1 / C licence for pleasure or not, the disciplinary body is the Traffic Commissioners. They can remove these entitlements for any offence as they see fit, without recourse to a court. The only criteria is that they believe you are (not you personally) no longer a fit and proper person to hold these entielements. It can be contested, but a waste of time.
The CPC (not the driver one).
There are proposed for changes to the CPC as such: The EU has a provision for CPC holders to undertake a refresher course every 10years, and also a propision for CPC holders who have not been actively involved in transport management within the previous 5 years may have to undertake a refresher course.
These provisions already exist, but are a matter for each EU nation to decide upon.
Not implemented in the UK.
It is not yet clear whether the DfT will or will not implement these provisions.
They aren't making noises.
I stress that these are provisions or proposals, and not yet either agreed or in force. Please folks, don't go off on one with supposed "definites".
Cheers
John