wild camping scarborough (1 Viewer)

[pigginchilli]

Good on you and good luck.

Thanks mate, not a Itinerant just want to eat from local fish and chips and walk our dogs on beach.

 

[pigginchilli]

fish and chips twice by the look of it.

 

[GJH]

As always follow the money. Some will disagree but wherever there is direct action against motorhomes there seems to be a councillor or two with 'other interests'...

Allegedly of course

Isn't it always? Has anyone actually seen any evidence or is it just rumours put about by people tripping over their pet lips?

It is now.....

Cllr Backhouse has just sold his site to either Warners (Cayton bay) or Blue dolphin.

No notice to static owners, just sold up and went.

Backhouse was the councillor who wanted to allow overnighting in Scarborough Borough car parks until the planning problem was raised by somebody else. It's all there on Google

^{_{Subscribers  do not see these advertisements}}

 

[pigginchilli]

Isn't it always? Has anyone actually seen any evidence or is it just rumours put about by people tripping over their pet lips?

Backhouse was the councillor who wanted to allow overnighting in Scarborough Borough car parks until the planning problem was raised by somebody else. It's all there on Google

Too boring! Some people have too get up for work and do a hard days graft.

 

[pappajohn]

Backhouse was the councillor who wanted to allow overnighting in Scarborough Borough car parks until the planning problem was raised by somebody else. It's all there on Google

Didnt realise that graham....but he did have a site and sold it.
A close friend lives on the site and only found out when she got a letter from the new owners.
I dont think thats legal, but then, he is a councillor

 

[angusboy]

They can stick fish and chips where the sun dont shine wont spend a penny there.but good luck

^{_{Subscribers  do not see these advertisements}}

 

[GJH]

Didnt realise that graham....but he did have a site and sold it.
A close friend lives on the site and only found out when she got a letter from the new owners.
I dont think thats legal, but then, he is a councillor

Yes, I know he had a site John. I don't think there's anything illegal about selling it though is there? Landlords sell properties every day.

 

[gus-lopez]

Yes, I know he had a site John. I don't think there's anything illegal about selling it though is there? Landlords sell properties every day.

Yes but tenant's have to be informed. No idea whether it would be the same with a site & statics.

 

[GJH]

Yes but tenant's have to be informed. No idea whether it would be the same with a site & statics.

It may be good practice to inform tenants but what legislation says they actually have to be informed?

^{_{Subscribers  do not see these advertisements}}

 

[Bertie Bassett]

Isn't it always? Has anyone actually seen any evidence or is it just rumours put about by people tripping over their pet lips?

Backhouse was the councillor who wanted to allow overnighting in Scarborough Borough car parks until the planning problem was raised by somebody else. It's all there on Google

Evidence that sees the light of day in court you mean? Rare. Evidence that Blind Pugh would have difficulty missing....aplenty. Dawlish and the ill fated 'aire' being a prime example. Allegedly.

 

[GJH]

Evidence that sees the light of day in court you mean? Rare. Evidence that Blind Pugh would have difficulty missing....aplenty. Dawlish and the ill fated 'aire' being a prime example. Allegedly.

Overnight stops in the car park at Dawlish and the other Teignbridge car parks involved was stopped because they don't have planning consent for camping, only parking. I've never seen any suggestion that there was any element of "a councillor or two with 'other interests'...". If there is then let's get it publicised so that something can be done about it

 

[Bertie Bassett]

Overnight stops in the car park at Dawlish and the other Teignbridge car parks involved was stopped because they don't have planning consent for camping, only parking. I've never seen any suggestion that there was any element of "a councillor or two with 'other interests'...". If there is then let's get it publicised so that something can be done about it

OK Graham I bow to your greater knowledge of the wondrousness and probity of our local councillors. However look at the register of interests of the five town councillors which is an interesting read on its own.

^{_{Subscribers  do not see these advertisements}}

 

[Bertie Bassett]

Overnight stops in the car park at Dawlish and the other Teignbridge car parks involved was stopped because they don't have planning consent for camping, only parking. I've never seen any suggestion that there was any element of "a councillor or two with 'other interests'...". If there is then let's get it publicised so that something can be done about it

If that was really, honestly and truly the case Powys Council really must stop allowing 1 night in 7 on its car parks. Shurely Shirley

 

[GJH]

OK Graham I bow to your greater knowledge of the wondrousness and probity of our local councillors. However look at the register of interests of the five town councillors which is an interesting read on its own.

Farmer, Retired, No employment, Retired - Former Shop Keeper, Retired Shoe Repairer - Possible Part Time Occasional Employment. Interesting maybe but doesn't indicate any partiality regarding the car parks

If that was really, honestly and truly the case Powys Council really must stop allowing 1 night in 7 on its car parks. Shurely Shirley

No, because Powys Council included the relevant consent when they were created, the same as Canterbury did for the P&R.

 

[Bertie Bassett]

Sorry Graham but you're being disingenous. There is at least one member with a current and specific interest which she has declared.

^{_{Subscribers  do not see these advertisements}}

 

[teensvan99]

Hi pigginchilli. We also have a 125 yam which rides on a homemade rear carrier on the van or we trailer the gsx. Had the 1999 1200 Bandit what fun. Wife only rides on the 125 but still gets us about. Have fun in UK but better over the water. We know we full timed for over seven half years.

 

[GJH]

Sorry Graham but you're being disingenous. There is at least one member with a current and specific interest which she has declared.

I just copied what is on the web site. The two female members list land holdings but there is no indication what they are.
Looking on Google, two listed by one member appear to be private houses. The three listed by the other female member appear to be a cafe, a clothing retailer and "Treetops" which is the same as her address so, presumably another private house.
What am I missing and how does it imply any impropriety?

 

[Bertie Bassett]

I just copied what is on the web site. The two female members list land holdings but there is no indication what they are.
Looking on Google, two listed by one member appear to be private houses. The three listed by the other female member appear to be a cafe, a clothing retailer and "Treetops" which is the same as her address so, presumably another private house.
What am I missing and how does it imply any impropriety?

I used the 'aire' in Dawlish regularly and took a particular interest when it was 'closed.' I'm not going to have an argument Graham. There is more to this than can be 'googled'. And on that note there will be no further comment from me.

^{_{Subscribers  do not see these advertisements}}

 

[pappajohn]

Yes, I know he had a site John. I don't think there's anything illegal about selling it though is there? Landlords sell properties every day.

Without informing their ground rent paying tenants. ???

 

[GJH]

Without informing their ground rent paying tenants. ???

Yes. I used to be a ground (rather than dwelling) landlord. When I took over ownership from my Father I informed the tenants rather than him. When I sold them (they soon became more bother than they were worth because they were on 999 year leases) the purchaser informed the tenants. So long as the tenant knows who the landlord is and there is no attempt to bypass or vary any part of the tenancy agreement there surely isn't a problem.

 

[Bertie Bassett]

Yes. I used to be a ground (rather than dwelling) landlord. When I took over ownership from my Father I informed the tenants rather than him. When I sold them (they soon became more bother than they were worth because they were on 999 year leases) the purchaser informed the tenants. So long as the tenant knows who the landlord is and there is no attempt to bypass or vary any part of the tenancy agreement there surely isn't a problem.

A landowner too Graham, I just knew you were posh

^{_{Subscribers  do not see these advertisements}}

 

[GJH]

A landowner too Graham, I just knew you were posh

I had ancestors who were pretty well off. Trouble is they had lots of kids as well and distributed the money amongst them rather than passing it down my direct line

My Dad inherited some ground rents when his maiden Aunt died in the 1960s and I took them on when collecting was getting too much for him. Trouble is the rents were set at levels which were OK in the latter half of the 19th century but couldn't be increased

 

[Bertie Bassett]

I had ancestors who were pretty well off. Trouble is they had lots of kids as well and distributed the money amongst them rather than passing it down my direct line

My Dad inherited some ground rents when his maiden Aunt died in the 1960s and I took them on when collecting was getting too much for him. Trouble is the rents were set at levels which were OK in the latter half of the 19th century but couldn't be increased

All my ancestors were paupers

 

[GJH]

All my ancestors were paupers

Never mind. There have to be some commoners for we posh people to look down on

^{_{Subscribers  do not see these advertisements}}

 

[Twos company]

so has anyone been physically moved on or knocked up and bothered or fined for overnighting on marine drive or is it just scaremongering?

 

[Bertie Bassett]

so has anyone been physically moved on or knocked up and bothered or fined for overnighting on marine drive or is it just scaremongering?

There have been many'knocked up'on Marine Drive I can assure you

 

[Wildbill]

the sea life centre carpark is fine we stay there on a regular basis when it our turn to tack wee man to see his mother.
ignoring the marine drive restrictions will only make things worse and antagonise a all ready hostile natives.
the ones that f#';d up the parking in scarbough were the ones that didn't give a toss for discretion rules and just taking the piss
and yes I have know of folks being moved on
bill

^{_{Subscribers  do not see these advertisements}}

 

[angusboy]

They can still stick there fish and chips and everything else

 

[GJH]

the sea life centre carpark is fine we stay there on a regular basis when it our turn to tack wee man to see his mother.
ignoring the marine drive restrictions will only make things worse and antagonise a all ready hostile natives.
the ones that f#';d up the parking in scarbough were the ones that didn't give a toss for discretion rules and just taking the piss
and yes I have know of folks being moved on
bill

You've been lucky then Bill. Officially there is no sleeping or overnight camping at Scalby Mills car park.

 

[gus-lopez]

It may be good practice to inform tenants but what legislation says they actually have to be informed?

THE RFR .Right to first refusal.

" Where a landlord is proposing to sell his interest in a building containing flats in relation to which the RFR exists, he must, by law, first offer it to the tenants before offering it on the open market. He must serve formal notices on the tenants telling them what he is intending and must provide time for them to consider the offer; he cannot sell to another party during that time, nor offer the interest to anyone else at a price less than that proposed to the tenants or on different terms. Breach of these legal obligations by the landlord is a criminal offence. If the landlord sells without providing the Right of First Refusal, the tenants can serve a notice on the new owner demanding details of the transaction, including the price paid; they can then take action to force the new owner to sell to them at the price he paid."

http://www.lease-advice.org/publications/documents/document.asp?item=16#10


Only applies to purpose built blocks & the regs for statics are here & 15% is the max that a site owner can charge. Even that is far too much.
http://www.nidirect.gov.uk/selling-your-static-caravan

^{_{Subscribers  do not see these advertisements}}