Carioca 656 2004 model weight (1 Viewer)

redpis

Free Member
Mar 8, 2009
24
0
Funster No
5,863
Hi,

I have a 2004 registered Carioca 656 (long wheel base) looking on the net I have two different weights listed, can anyone tell me the maximum weight on this model.

Cheers

Ian
 

656

Free Member
Jul 30, 2007
1,052
290
The universe
Funster No
39
MH
C Class
Exp
6
Your van is the same as mine, this is from the load plate

Max Weight fully loaded 3400kg

Max Train Weight 4600kg

Axle 1 1750kg

Axle 2 1900kg
 

lebesset

Free Member
May 31, 2009
760
2
Funster No
6,945
it's what it says on the plate on the vehicle !

Subscribers  do not see these advertisements

 
OP
OP
R

redpis

Free Member
Mar 8, 2009
24
0
Funster No
5,863
look on the bonnet latch panel...in front of the radiator.
small ally plate or sticker around 2" square.
usual place., :thumb:

Spot on, had seen that before but didn't realise that it had that information on it, presumed (wrongly) that it should be found in the log book DOH!

For info mine says:

3400

5000

1750

1900

Subscribers  do not see these advertisements

 

pappajohn

LIFE MEMBER
Aug 26, 2007
43,286
49,202
Dark side of the moon
Funster No
172
Exp
Since 2005
Spot on, had seen that before but didn't realise that it had that information on it, presumed (wrongly) that it should be found in the log book DOH!

For info mine says:

3400

5000

1750

1900

3400kg = total max weight of van fully loaded....do not exceed !

5000kg total weight of van and trailer combined.

1750kg = front axle max weight

1900kg = rear axle max weight

your max trailer weight is 1600kg if the van is fully loaded to max weight.

front and rear axles always add up to more than the total vehicle weight to allow for uneven loading. they should never be exceeded individually nor the total weight.

if the rear is 1900kg then the front can only be 1500kg...
1900kg + 1500kg = 3400kg.
 

lebesset

Free Member
May 31, 2009
760
2
Funster No
6,945
precise summation from PJ

now load it right up as you would for a trip , and off to the weighbridge to check that you won't be in trouble with VOSA
 
OP
OP
R

redpis

Free Member
Mar 8, 2009
24
0
Funster No
5,863
precise summation from PJ

now load it right up as you would for a trip , and off to the weighbridge to check that you won't be in trouble with VOSA

Had the van weighed, not fully loaded and the weights came out as:

Gross 2960
Front Axle 1380
Rear Axle 1580

The main purpose was to get the correct tyre pressures which I have done, when the kids are off next, I'll load it up and see what margin, if any, I have!

many thanks for all your help with this

Ian

Subscribers  do not see these advertisements

 

lebesset

Free Member
May 31, 2009
760
2
Funster No
6,945
as you don't know the fully laden axle weights , how have you found out the correct tyre pressures?
 
OP
OP
R

redpis

Free Member
Mar 8, 2009
24
0
Funster No
5,863
as you don't know the fully laden axle weights , how have you found out the correct tyre pressures?

I havn't for fully laden only for what it is now, this baseline weight is the normal one for us, when we are going to go on our next trip, I'll get it re -weighed.

I sent the details of my actual weights to Continental and they gave me the following information for vanco camper 215/70 R15:

Front - 43psi
Rear - 47 psi

The formula (Gained from another site):

Base figure of 1490kg at 43.5psi, every 100kg will require an increase of 3.6 psi up to a maximum of 2060kg at 65psi.

Ian

Subscribers  do not see these advertisements

 

pappajohn

LIFE MEMBER
Aug 26, 2007
43,286
49,202
Dark side of the moon
Funster No
172
Exp
Since 2005
Base figure of 1490kg at 43.5psi, every 100kg will require an increase of 3.6 psi up to a maximum of 2060kg at 65psi.

Ian

as i thought Ian.

couple of kids will weigh 80 to 100kg max ????

so the pressure isnt that critical if you forget to take the kids with you.:Doh::ROFLMAO:
 

lebesset

Free Member
May 31, 2009
760
2
Funster No
6,945
can,t be correct because the increase of load capacity to pressure isn't linear

and the figures you have quoted sound too low to me , I have the same chassis [I presume , a 2.8 ] and use 65 psi front and 73 psi rear loaded , the reduction for being lighter shouldn't be that much
michelin said to use 80 psi , 5.5 bar, front and back
 
OP
OP
R

redpis

Free Member
Mar 8, 2009
24
0
Funster No
5,863
can,t be correct because the increase of load capacity to pressure isn't linear

and the figures you have quoted sound too low to me , I have the same chassis [I presume , a 2.8 ] and use 65 psi front and 73 psi rear loaded , the reduction for being lighter shouldn't be that much
michelin said to use 80 psi , 5.5 bar, front and back

The engine is a 2.0, the info re tyre pressures came from:

http://************************/ftopict-86250-html

The door pillar pressure are 71 psi, so I agree it does appear very low, but I have consulted the manufacturer and thats their documented advice, i will off course keep an eye for tread wear etc

Subscribers  do not see these advertisements

 

Join us or log in to post a reply.

To join in you must be a member of MotorhomeFun

Join MotorhomeFun

Join us, it quick and easy!

Log in

Already a member? Log in here.

Latest journal entries

Funsters who are viewing this thread

Back
Top