Mechanical Doping (1 Viewer)

jonandshell

Free Member
Dec 12, 2010
5,476
8,299
Norfolk
Funster No
14,648
MH
Not got one!
Exp
Since 2006
Don't get it.
The extra weight would negate any advantages that the motor with its limited battery pack could deliver.
 

DuxDeluxe

LIFE MEMBER
Jul 10, 2008
14,627
72,221
Planet Zog
Funster No
3,243
MH
A woosh bang van
Exp
since 2008
Don't get it.
The extra weight would negate any advantages that the motor with its limited battery pack could deliver.
Well, I suppose that they would have made the calculations before taking the risks

Subscribers  do not see these advertisements

 
OP
OP
Chipster

Chipster

LIFE MEMBER
Oct 15, 2013
1,005
1,118
East Midlands
Funster No
28,588
MH
A Class
Exp
Getting there!
Don't get it.
The extra weight would negate any advantages that the motor with its limited battery pack could deliver.
Yes but there is a minimum weight set by the UCI for the bike anyway. Maybe the frame itself is lighter than allowed then adding the motor takes it close to allowed minimum weight. Bit more here-
Broken Link Removed
 

Join us or log in to post a reply.

To join in you must be a member of MotorhomeFun

Join MotorhomeFun

Join us, it quick and easy!

Log in

Already a member? Log in here.

Latest journal entries

Funsters who are viewing this thread

Back
Top